Pages

Sunday, 28 May 2017

Follow Buddha's wisdom

re: "How our education sustains dictatorship" (BP, May 25)


Dear editor,
As always, it was a joy to start the morning with a healthy helping of Sanitsuda Ekachai's concisely written analyses of Thai society. In "How our education sustains dictatorship" (BP, May 25), Sanitsuda outlines clearly how the militarization of Thai education harms not only Thai education, infamously failing for decades, but how the pernicious effects of the centralized command over young minds oozes out to pervade all of Thai society, to the great harm of society, politics and morals. The society-wide malaise does indeed start in the official Thai education hierarchy.

I would like to suggest one part of a solution to this chronic illness: the wisdom of the Buddha as set forth in his Kalama Sutta. In this work, apparently little known by Thai Buddhists, certainly not encouraged reading by Thai Buddhist monks or in Thai schools, the Buddha himself advises the citizens of Kesputta on guidelines for seeking right understanding, for acquiring knowledge of substance, and for working towards opinion of real worth. As the Buddha sagely argues in this short sermon: "It is proper for you, Kalamas, to doubt, to be uncertain; uncertainty has arisen in you about what is doubtful. Come, Kalamas. Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumor; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias toward a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another's seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, 'The monk is our teacher'" (Kalama Sutta, trans. Soma Thera, 1994).

The Buddha shares the same insight as Socrates, as Plato and of other great thinkers: namely,  that questioning in open discussion is a necessary condition for knowledge. When censorship and repressive authority criminalizes free speech and free association, the aim is always to enforce ignorance of truths that would embarrass the law makers who create such rule of law that is not only anti-democratic in its rejection of the good morals on which democratic principle is founded, but is also unBuddhist, rejecting the Buddha's wise teaching that progress depends on right understanding. Absent understanding that has been solidly tested by having to defend itself, by having to rebut dissenting ideas, by having to acknowledge and answer contradictory evidence, there can be no knowledge or opinion of worth, only myth, fantasy, deceit and bigotry masquerading as authoritative knowledge. These, the Buddha wisely teaches, are not paths to a good life.

But would Thai teachers, not to mention monks in positions of power and other political leaders used to blind, unquestioning conformity to their unsupported claims, allow such radical reform as advised in the Buddha's excellent teachings? Indeed, were the Buddha to arrive in Thailand in 2017, could his critical search for truth, his respect for honesty and his demands for solidly founded understanding not land him in accommodation next to the likes of Jatupat Boonpattaraksa (Pai Dao Din) and the internationally respected academics of Thai history, society and politics forced into exile for seeking to follow the wisdom of the Buddha?


 Felix Qui

_______________________________


The above letter to the editor is the text as submitted by Felix Qui to the Bangkok Post.

The text as edited was published in PostBag on May 28, 2017, under the title "Follow Buddha's wisdom" at https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/postbag/1257830/follow-buddhas-wisdom
  

Sunday, 14 May 2017

Jatupat deserves rights prize

re: "Envoy queries Korea award for Jatupat" (2017, May 10)


Post Bag, The Bangkok Post.

Dear editor,

His recent letter to the human rights award committee suggests that Thailand's ambassador to South Korea fails to understand that the patriotic Jatupat Boonpattararaksa deserves the Gwangju Prize for Human Rights 2017 precisely because of the suffering inflicted on him by Thai law.

Like the long tradition of civil rights activists before him, from Socrates, through Rosa Parks and to Arab bloggers being flogged for blasphemy, every one of Jatupat's (Pai Dao Din's) alleged crimes were the morally right thing to do but are deemed crimes by unjust law. Pai Dao Din selflessly accepts the consequences of having courageously done the right thing to highlight injustices in Thai rule of law, which rule of law, contrary to the ambassador's claim, neither values nor supports the basic democratic principles of freedom of expression, association and assembly. Societies that value and support those basic democratic values do not do what is being done to Jatupat strictly according to the rule of law.

 Felix Qui

_______________________________


The above letter to the editor is the text as submitted by Felix Qui to the Bangkok Post.

The text as edited was published in PostBag on May 14, 2017, under the title "Jatupat deserves rights prize" at https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/postbag/1249254/jatupat-deserves-rights-prize
  

Saturday, 13 May 2017

Revamp drug policy

re: Editorial: "Drug reform still pending" (2017, May 10)


Post Bag, The Bangkok Post.

Dear editor,

The efforts of former minister of justice Paiboon Koomchaya to radically reform Thailand's long failing drug laws were a chance for the current government to do something of value that would not only correct a policy that has for decades been proved an expensive abject failure, but which would have seriously hit major sources of corruption fuelled by current drug policy. It appears the current set of military politicians would prefer to keep the lines of corruption open and flowing. Decriminalizing drugs not only hits corruption, it would be a serious blow to the mafia scum now profiting immensely from the drug trade by working with corrupt officials.

Collateral benefits of decriminalization include: massive savings of the financial and human resources now uselessly wasted on the drug war; increased tax revenue, which could be used to provide rehabilitation and education programs; reduced crime since addicts would not need so much to support that habits; improved health outcomes as help could more easily be obtained; and far less crowded prisons as less Thai youth were lumbered with harmful arrest records for nothing more than seeking some pleasure. Nor is there any reason to think that decriminalization would increase drug use: the evidence on this from cases that compare drug use before and after, or after and before, decriminalization consistently show no strong correlation between the legal status of a drug and the prevalence of use. Worth Googling here are the before and after experiences of Prohibition in the US in the early 20th century (a boon to US mafia), the marijuana experiences of Amsterdam and US states, the opium experience of 19th century China, drug use in Portugal since it decriminalized all personal drug use in 2001, and of course, the regular massive seizures and persistent rates of drug use throughout Thai society show that criminalizing the sale and use of yaa baa and other highly popular drugs has not led to any demonstrable reduction in the use of those drugs by Thais.

With only benefits for society, save harm to two groups, it is hard to understand why any set of politicians would oppose decriminalizing drug use. Do corrupt officials and mafia scum really deserve such profitable indulgence from Thai law makers?

 Felix Qui

_______________________________


The above letter to the editor is the text as submitted by Felix Qui to the Bangkok Post.

The text as edited was published in PostBag on May 13, 2017, under the title "Revamp drug policy" at https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/postbag/1248810/revamp-drug-policy