re: "Gay Rights Are Civil Rights" (The New York Times, June 16, 2020)
That is good news, and as written by Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch, the majority opinion is founded solidly on an interpretation of existing US law.
It would have been great to have seen the Congress of the United States act to have definitively legislated what has now been clarified to be the law by the US Supreme Court. But then, it would also have been great to have seen the US legislature move to protect abortion on request for the sake of the lives of all human persons, but the reality is that the elected legislators are not always eager to do what is just according to the law as written in the US Constitution and its dependent statutes.
_______________________________
The above comment was submitted by Felix Qui to the The New York Times article.
It is published there at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/15/opinion/lgbt-supreme-court-ruling.html#commentsContainer&permid=107621196:107621196
No comments:
Post a Comment
However strongly dissenting or concurring, politely worded comments are welcome.
Please note, however, that, due to Felix Qui's liability for them, comments must comply with Thai law, and are moderated accordingly.